Commonwealth Supply Chain Advisors recently published a ground-breaking white-paper titled, “Beating Murphy’s Law in Warehouse Automation Projects.” The full paper examines a number of the reasons why automation projects fail to meet expectations, and what companies can do to beat Murphy’s Law. This blog is eighth in an ongoing series on “Beating Murphy’s Law in Warehouse Automation Projects.
While it may be impossible to forecast everything that could go wrong on a project, experienced project leaders, who have implemented similar technology numerous times before, can usually do a better job of anticipating the likely problem areas than can individuals who are working on their first project of this kind. Veterans are far less likely to minimize the risks of going live too soon and can often temper the desire to finish “on time” with the need for the system to work properly.
The value of having a project leader who has implemented similar technology many times in the past cannot be overstated.
It may be possible to hire such a resource as a company employee, and have that individual then transition to an operational role once the project is over. Some companies have found that it is more practical to use an external consultant in this role. Many consultants have transitioned from one warehouse automation project to the next over a period of two to three decades, giving them vastly more project experience than an operations leader who may have only gone through the warehouse automation cycle a few times. Automation consultants can bring targeted experience to the project during a defined period without having to stay on the payroll once the system is running and stabilized.
To read Commonwealth’s complete white-paper titled, Beating Murphy’s Law in Warehouse Automation Projects, click here.